You're Grounded For The Rest Of
Your Life - There's No Appeal.
Parenting: It's all the proof we need, really, that
totalitarianism is alive and well in America.
To some people, it's known as grounding. To
others, it's authoritarian rule, pure and simple. Whatever
you choose to call it, grounding is one of those things
that sets parents apart from all other human beings. If we
don't like something, we have the unquestioned authority
to ground in whatever way we see fit.
We can send a kid to his room, keep a
daughter off the phone for a week, prevent a child from
playing outside or stop our kid from checking his or her
e-mail. (See, there IS something good about new
technology: it allows parents to be even MORE creative
when punishing their children.)
Personally, my favorite grounding is:
"I'LL GROUND YOU FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!" Such an edict
does not require details. It is not necessary to tell a
child that you will, for instance, ground him from playing
outside for the rest of his life. He need only know that
he will be punished for as long as you both shall live.
Honestly, I think deep down inside the child knows Dad
cannot legally or logistically ground him FOREVER, but
threatening a child with such long-term punishment leaves
just one lasting impression: Dad ain't foolin' around.
If a kid stops and thinks about it,
he'll soon figure out that when he is grown and 25,
chances are Mom and Dad won't care if he goes outside and
rides his tricycle. So, perpetual punishment is more just
an exercise in theatrics for most parents. In fact, it's
probably why children start rolling their eyes.
I suppose Mrs. P and I have been lucky,
but we've never had any of our children tell us they'd
like to appeal a sentence we've handed down to them. I
feel fairly confident that there have been a few instances
in some far away country (or maybe California) where
children have actually stood up to a punishment delivered
by Mom and Dad.
Here's hoping lawyers stay away from our
children and don't some day, when short on clients, run up
to a kid and say, "Y'know, you don't have to take this.
Legally you have a right to question just exactly WHY you
can't sleep with Buzz Lightyear tonight."
Hey, it could happen. This is America,
after all.
Recently, a kid in my daughter's math
class came home FOUR HOURS LATE. The kid's punishment was
the loss of phone privileges for a week. Two nights into
his punishment, the kid tells his Mom he needs help with
math homework. So Mom gets on the phone and calls our
house and starts asking my kid about algebra homework. The
Mom on the other end of the phone then relays my kid's
advice to her boy. It's a good thing our kid wasn't
grounded from the phone that particular week: Neither Mrs.
P or I know enough about algebra to even be conversational
about it, much less ask questions and relay anything that
resembles help to our kid, who is vastly more intelligent
than we are when it comes to algebra.
I personally feel the mother who placed
the phone call for her son should be grounded herself.
Maybe she should have to drive her husband's car for a
week.
A couple of months ago, we had to hand a
down a particularly harsh sentence to one of our own. We
were forced to punish her for actually taking a shower. I
know, I know, it sounds a little rough, but before you
jump to conclusions, allow me to explain.
She was late getting out of bed on a
school morning, not at all a rare occurrence. The
Patterson Family ByLaws (Page 34, Paragraph 7, Section 2)
state, "If you don't make it in the shower by 6:20 a.m. on
school mornings, you're out of luck, bud. You go to school
dirty."
So on this morning, our daughter walked
into the bathroom and turned on the shower water at 6:24
a.m. -- a clear violation of the shower rule. Not a
violation itself, but we told her if she continued with
the shower idea, we would be forced to take action. When
given the opportunity to decide: shower and face the
consequences, or no shower and be free, she opted for the
latter. She said she would rather be grounded from the
phone for several days instead of face the notion of going
to school dirty. So it was actually her decision to be
grounded (which proves democracy is alive and well even
where authoritarianism is the predominant form of
governing).
It's probably better for all concerned
that she did choose to shower and do without the phone for
a week. Had she chosen to go to school dirty and smelly,
her friends probably wouldn't have called her anyway.

To read previous "Life With Dad" columns,
Visit the
site. If you enjoy this column, send it to some
friends or family, or invite them to join our mailing
list. And thank you.
Email the author.
Sticky
Doorknobs" is filled with humorous insights into the
situations parents everywhere endure every day. Whether
it's playing chauffeur to a 10-year-old, sitting up all
night with a sick 7-year-old or embarrassing your
teenager, "Sticky Doorknobs" shows us that laughter and
life with kids can -- and must -- go hand in hand. Order
your copy today